Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, or PFAS, is an umbrella word for a family of thousands of compounds valued for their indestructibility and non-stick qualities. At the last count, there were roughly 12,000 different types of PFAS. For years, clothing manufacturers have used PFAS, often known as "forever chemicals," to create raincoats, boots, backpacks, and other products that are water- and stain-resistant. Almost 50% of all PFAS are used globally in the textile industry. The ability of PFAS to repel water and oil allows textile makers to create textiles that are waterproof and stain-resistant. As a result, PFAS are frequently utilized in outdoor clothing and accessories (e.g., waterproof shoes, jackets, backpacks, tents).
Yet, a rising amount of evidence indicates that the environment and human health are both negatively impacted by these chemicals.
The PFAS ability to reject grease and water as well as their high mobility allow them to migrate into the environment after leaving their original products, for example, by sliding out of abandoned landfills. This is unfortunate because many PFAS also have a tendency to bioaccumulate, which means they are taken up by living things more quickly than they can be eliminated and hence accumulate over time. PFAS have the potential to be harmful to both people and animals. PFOA and PFOS, two of the most researched members of this family of chemicals, have been associated with lowered immunological responses in children following vaccination.
Although the major transition away from PFAS in textiles is already in motion, the earliest state prohibitions won't go into effect until 2025. Businesses are currently vying to remove them from clothing before state-level restrictions go into effect over the next few years.
Until the regulations are made, consumers are left to determine for themselves whether the products they currently own or wish to purchase contain PFAS.
As stated by Danielle Melgar, from Public Interest Research Groups, as there are no labeling regulations for PFAS, businesses can essentially say whatever they want, and many times this results in purposefully false labeling. The advocates from the Natural Resources Defense Council and Fashion FWD report that even though there are some PFAS labels, some of them may be inaccurate or misleading. For instance, watch out for labels that state that a piece of clothing is devoid of a particular PFAS chemical, such as PFOA- or PFOS-free clothing, as this could indicate the use of other kinds of PFAS.
As posited in an article by Zahra Hijri, a Bloomberg writer, according to the research work, even the designation "PFC-free" may be deceptive if businesses merely use PFC to refer to a portion of PFAS compounds rather than all of them. Activists advise customers to inquire with the manufacturer if a product includes PFAs, particularly so-called PFAS polymers, regardless of the label.
Although a few brands have spearheaded the move away from PFAS, such as the PFC-Free label used by Jack Wolfskin, Vaude Sport, and Haglofs, consumers will still need to wait until more stringent laws make PFAS-free solutions more widely available for many more brands. Many advocates have spoken against this challenge for consumers to identify the PFAS-free products. Avinash Kar from the Natural Resources Defense Council states that instead of consumers buying their way out of the problem, passing PFAS labeling rules helps ensure that the things people purchase are not damaging to them or the environment, which is something the manufacturers should be making sure of.
References:
Hirji, Zahra. 2023. Navigating the Wild West of PFAS Labeling on Clothing. Retrieved from https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-02-09/is-your-raincoat-made-with-pfas-it-may-be-hard-to-find-out?leadSource=uverify%20wall
Salvidge Rachel & Leana, Hosea. 2023. What are PFAS, how toxic are they and how do you become exposed? Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2023/feb/23/what-are-pfas-forever-chemicals-how-toxic-are-they-and-how-do-you-become-exposed
Straková, J., Grechko, V., Brosché, S., Karlsson, T., Buonsante, V. PFAS in Clothing: Study in Indonesia, China, and Russia Shows Barriers for Non-toxic Circular Economy. International Pollutants Elimination Network (IPEN), February 2022.
Photo by wavebreakmedia_micro via https://www.freepik.com/Related Insights

Decarbonizing Chemical Supply Chains: Beyond Just Production
Chemical industry decarbonization efforts often focus on production processes, but logistics
18 June 2026 Tradeasia Team

EPA’s PFAS TSCA Reporting Rule Finalized June 2026: What Importers Must Do Now
The EPA has finalized a sweeping PFAS reporting rule under TSCA Section 8(a)(7), covering all PFAS manufactured and imported in the U.S. from 2011‑2022. Importers of PFAS‑containing resins, coatings and functional chemicals need to act fast to meet the new compliance window and portal requirements. This article explains the rule, the reporting timeline, and practical steps to stay compliant.
22 June 2026 Tradeasia Team

EU Microplastics Regulation 2026: Reformulation Pressure on Cosmetics and Coatings
The upcoming EU microplastics regulation, effective July 2026, will compel cosmetics and coatings manufacturers to eliminate polymer microbeads and switch to compliant alternatives. This article explores the regulatory backdrop, the challenges faced by supply chains, and practical reformulation strategies such as biodegradable microspheres, encapsulated fragrance systems, and silica‑based additives.
29 June 2026 Tradeasia Team

Food Additive Regulations: Pesticide Exposure Study Adds New Scrutiny to Chemical Residues in Food Supply
Food manufacturers face increasing pressure to strengthen residue compliance and supplier verification programs.
23 June 2026 Tradeasia Team

India Duty Waiver Expiry: Pharmaceutical Packaging Input Cost Reset in July 2026
India's temporary customs duty waiver on key pharmaceutical packaging polymers expires, reshaping procurement costs for medical packaging manufacturers. Here's what pharmaceutical companies should expect in Q3 2026.
30 June 2026 Tradeasia Team

Retailer Dye Removal Pledges: What 2026‑2027 Deadlines Mean for Food Manufacturers
Retailers are tightening their standards on synthetic food dyes, setting 2026‑2027 deadlines that force manufacturers to reexamine ingredient sourcing and reformulation strategies. The shift toward natural colorants and clean‑label compliance reshapes product development, cost structures, and supply chains. This article breaks down the commitments, impacts, and practical steps for food companies.
14 July 2026 Tradeasia Team
Don't miss out on our updates! Subscribe to our newsletter now
We're committed to your privacy. Tradeasia uses the information you provide to us to contact you about our relevant content, products, and services. For more information, check out our privacy policy.

